IP Litigation

We represent clients on both sides of intellectual property disputes, from enforcing rights against infringers to defending against infringement claims. Our litigation practice covers the full range of IP matters, with a focus on clear, strategic advocacy tailored to your business goals.

Representative Matters

  • Stallion Infrastructure Services, Ltd. v. Stallion Pro Services LLC, No. 2:26-cv-1836 (C.D. Cal.). Represent provider of temporary infrastructure equipment and services asserting Lanham Act and related claims against competitor.

  • Pacem IP Holdings LLC v. Sunco Lighting, Inc., No. 2:25-cv-9704 (C.D. Cal.). Represented lighting company against NPE in a five-patent litigation.

  • Lumen21, Inv. v. Lumen Technologies, Inc., et al., No. 8:25-cv-510 (C.D. Cal.). Represented IT services company asserting Lanham Act and related claims against Fortune 500 competitor.

  • State of Arizona v. Google LLC, CV2020-006219 (Ariz.). Represented the State of Arizona against Google for misleading and deceiving consumers about the collection of their location data. Resulted in $85 million settlement. (Media)

  • Michael Grecco Productions Inc. v. Ziff Davis, LLC, 2:19-cv-4776 (C.D. Cal.). Represented Ziff Davis against photographer asserting claim of copyright infringement.

  • Market Place Solutions, LLC v. Sutra Beauty, Inc., No. 2:18-cv-7608 (C.D. Cal.). Represented beauty brand against competitor’s Lanham Act claims.

  • FO2GO LLC v. KeepItSafe Inc., No. 1:18-cv-807 (D. Del.). Represented KeepItSafe against non-practicing entity in patent infringement action accusing KeepItSafe’s cloud storage system of infringing a patent relating to syncing digital cameras.

  • Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. Pounce Consulting, Inc., et al., No. 4:17-cv-4732 (N.D. Cal.). Represented Cadence Design Systems in a copyright, DMCA, and breach of contract action against foreign defendant and affiliates.

  • Updateme Inc. v. Axel Springer SE, et al., No. 3:17-cv-5054 (N.D. Cal.). Represented startup against European multinational media company asserting, among other claims, trademark infringement, fraud, and breach of contract.

  • Intel Corp. v. Future Link Systems LLC, 1:14-cv-377 (D. Del.). Represented Intel against non-practicing entity asserting infringement of nine patents pertaining to computer systems and chips.

  • We handle disputes regarding trademark infringement, dilution, cancellation, and unfair competition in federal court and the TTAB.

  • We represent clients in complex patent disputes involving validity, infringement, enforceability, and inventorship.

  • We litigate cases involving unauthorized use of creative works, including software, written materials, and visual content.

  • We prosecute and defend misappropriation claims involving confidential business information and know-how.